A phase III, open label, randomized multicenter controlled trial of oral versus intravenous treosulfan in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer: a study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO).

OBJECTIVE: In recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), there is a high demand on effective therapies with a mild toxicity profile. Treosulfan is an alkylating agent approved as oral (p.o.) and intravenous (i.v.) formulation for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Data on safety and efficacy for either formulation are rare. For the first time we conducted a randomized phase III study comparing both formulations in women with ROC. METHODS: Patients having received at least two previous lines of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: treosulfan i.v. 7000 mg/m2 d1 q4w or treosulfan p.o. 600 mg/m2 d1-28 q8w. Primary endpoint was safety regarding hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity grade III/IV, secondary endpoints were other toxicities, clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and quality of life. RESULTS: 250 patients were treated with treosulfan i.v. (128) or treosulfan p.o. (122). In general treosulfan therapy was well tolerated in both treatment arms. Leukopenia grade III/IV occurred significantly more frequently in the p.o. arm (3.9% i.v. arm, 14.8% p.o. arm, p = 0.002). Other toxicities were similar in both arms. CBR was comparable between arms (41.4% i.v. arm, 36.9% p.o. arm). No difference in TTP (3.7 months i.v. arm, 3.5 months p.o. arm) or OS (13.6 months i.v. arm, 10.4 months p.o. arm, p = 0.087) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Given the safety and efficacy results treosulfan is an acceptable option for heavily pretreated OC patients. Regarding the toxicity profile the i.v. application was better tolerated with less grade III and IV toxicities.

Digital-Direct-RT-PCR: a sensitive and specific method for quantification of CTC in patients with cervical carcinoma.

The detection of circulating tumour cells (CTC) in cancer patients may be useful for therapy monitoring and prediction of relapse. A sensitive assay based on HPV-oncogene transcripts which are highly specific for cervical cancer cells was established. The Digital-Direct-RT-PCR (DD-RT-PCR) combines Ficoll-separation, ThinPrep-fixation and one-step RT-PCR in a low-throughput digital-PCR format enabling the direct analysis and detection of individual CTC without RNA isolation. Experimental samples demonstrated a sensitivity of one HPV-positive cell in 500,000 HPV-negative cells. Spike-in experiments with down to 5 HPV-positive cells per millilitre EDTA-blood resulted in concordant positive results by PCR and immunocytochemistry. Blood samples from 3 of 10 CxCa patients each contained a single HPV-oncogene transcript expressing CTC among 5 to 15*10(5) MNBC. Only 1 of 7 patients with local but 2 of 3 women with systemic disease had CTC. This highly sensitive DD-RT-PCR for the detection of CTC may also be applied to other tumour entities which express tumour-specific transcripts.